Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 1 Seeds
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
Recap: The 7 Seeds
28. Notre Dame
27. Villanova
26. Cincinnati
25. Louisville
Recap: The 6 Seeds
24. Wake Forest
23. Indiana
22. Tennessee
21. Memphis
Recap: The 5 Seeds
20. Oklahoma St
19. Pittsburgh
18. UCLA
17. Oklahoma
Recap: The 4 Seeds
16. Syracuse
15. Ohio State
14. Gonzaga
13. Maryland
Recap: The 3 Seeds
12. Stanford
11. Texas
10. Wisconsin
9. Arizona
Recap: The 2 Seeds
8. Illinois
7. Florida
6. Kentucky
5. North Carolina
THE ONE SEEDS
4. Michigan St - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 247-94; JCI Rk: 4 (Prev Rk:5); SOS: 3
2007-08: 27-9; JCI Rk: 15; SOS: 24; Tourney: S16
Last 5 Years: 115-52; JCI Rk: 14; SOS: 9
First 5 Years: 132-42; JCI Rk: 2; SOS: 2
NCAA Apperances: 10 (24 wins)
National Championships: 1
Final Fours: 4
Elite 8's: 5
Sweet 16's: 6
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 27-9 | 15 | 24 | S16 |
| 2006-07 | 23-12 | 24 | 20 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 21-12 | 29 | 10 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 26-7 | 5 | 6 | F4 |
| 2003-04 | 18-12 | 48 | 34 | L1 |
| 2002-03 | 22-13 | 21 | 4 | E8 |
| 2001-02 | 18-12 | 38 | 17 | L1 |
| 2000-01 | 28-5 | 4 | 17 | F4 |
| 1999-00 | 32-7 | 1 | 3 | NC |
| 1998-99 | 32-5 | 3 | 5 | F4 |
3. Connecticut - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 255-82; JCI Rk: 3 (Prev Rk:3); SOS: 20
2007-08: 24-9; JCI Rk: 28; SOS: 52; Tourney: L1
Last 5 Years: 127-41; JCI Rk: 9; SOS: 25
First 5 Years: 128-41; JCI Rk: 3; SOS: 20
NCAA Apperances: 8 (22 wins)
National Championships: 2
Final Fours: 2
Elite 8's: 4
Sweet 16's: 5
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 24-9 | 28 | 52 | L1 |
| 2006-07 | 17-14 | 95 | 76 | None |
| 2005-06 | 30-4 | 2 | 8 | E8 |
| 2004-05 | 23-8 | 21 | 34 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 33-6 | 2 | 11 | NC |
| 2002-03 | 23-10 | 15 | 15 | S16 |
| 2001-02 | 27-7 | 5 | 18 | E8 |
| 2000-01 | 19-12 | 55 | 67 | None |
| 1999-00 | 25-10 | 20 | 12 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 34-2 | 1 | 15 | NC |
2. Kansas
Last 10 Years: 267-71; JCI Rk: 2 (Prev Rk:4); SOS: 18
2007-08: 36-3; JCI Rk: 1; SOS: 6; Tourney: NC
Last 5 Years: 139-32; JCI Rk: 3; SOS: 30
First 5 Years: 128-39; JCI Rk: 8; SOS: 15
NCAA Apperances: 10 (25 wins)
National Championships: 1
Final Fours: 3
Elite 8's: 5
Sweet 16's: 6
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 36-3 | 1 | 6 | NC |
| 2006-07 | 33-5 | 5 | 49 | E8 |
| 2005-06 | 24-8 | 28 | 74 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 23-7 | 15 | 22 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 23-9 | 20 | 27 | E8 |
| 2002-03 | 28-8 | 5 | 1 | F4 |
| 2001-02 | 31-4 | 2 | 8 | F4 |
| 2000-01 | 24-7 | 12 | 35 | S16 |
| 1999-00 | 23-10 | 26 | 20 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 22-10 | 29 | 50 | L2 |
1. Duke
Last 10 Years: 298-55; JCI Rk: 1 (Prev Rk:1); SOS: 4
2007-08: 28-6; JCI Rk: 8; SOS: 27; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 140-33; JCI Rk: 2; SOS: 3
First 5 Years: 158-22; JCI Rk: 1; SOS: 7
NCAA Apperances: 10 (26 wins)
National Championships: 1
Final Fours: 3
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 8
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 28-6 | 8 | 27 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 22-11 | 31 | 21 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 32-4 | 3 | 14 | S16 |
| 2004-05 | 27-6 | 4 | 8 | S16 |
| 2003-04 | 31-6 | 4 | 7 | F4 |
| 2002-03 | 26-7 | 10 | 26 | S16 |
| 2001-02 | 31-4 | 4 | 30 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 35-4 | 1 | 1 | NC |
| 1999-00 | 29-5 | 2 | 22 | S16 |
| 1998-99 | 37-2 | 2 | 9 | F4 |
posted by Jim Colton @ 11:07 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 2 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
Recap: The 7 Seeds
28. Notre Dame
27. Villanova
26. Cincinnati
25. Louisville
Recap: The 6 Seeds
24. Wake Forest
23. Indiana
22. Tennessee
21. Memphis
Recap: The 5 Seeds
20. Oklahoma St
19. Pittsburgh
18. UCLA
17. Oklahoma
Recap: The 4 Seeds
16. Syracuse
15. Ohio State
14. Gonzaga
13. Maryland
Recap: The 3 Seeds
12. Stanford
11. Texas
10. Wisconsin
9. Arizona
THE TWO SEEDS
8. Illinois - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 242-99; JCI Rk: 8 (Prev Rk:8); SOS: 8
2007-08: 16-19; JCI Rk: 91; SOS: 34; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 128-47; JCI Rk: 10; SOS: 31
First 5 Years: 114-52; JCI Rk: 11; SOS: 5
NCAA Apperances: 8 (15 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 16-19 | 91 | 34 | None |
| 2006-07 | 23-12 | 50 | 51 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 26-7 | 12 | 37 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 37-2 | 1 | 11 | F4 |
| 2003-04 | 26-7 | 17 | 39 | S16 |
| 2002-03 | 25-7 | 12 | 41 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 26-9 | 10 | 15 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 27-8 | 5 | 4 | E8 |
| 1999-00 | 22-10 | 19 | 8 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 14-18 | 46 | 2 | None |
7. Florida
Last 10 Years: 258-83; JCI Rk: 7 (Prev Rk:9); SOS: 21
2007-08: 24-12; JCI Rk: 52; SOS: 94; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 136-42; JCI Rk: 5; SOS: 15
First 5 Years: 122-41; JCI Rk: 10; SOS: 27
NCAA Apperances: 9 (22 wins)
National Championships: 2
Final Fours: 3
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 24-12 | 52 | 94 | None |
| 2006-07 | 35-5 | 2 | 5 | NC |
| 2005-06 | 33-6 | 1 | 5 | NC |
| 2004-05 | 24-8 | 22 | 45 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 20-11 | 27 | 13 | L1 |
| 2002-03 | 25-8 | 14 | 35 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 22-9 | 26 | 35 | L1 |
| 2000-01 | 24-7 | 14 | 42 | L2 |
| 1999-00 | 29-8 | 4 | 10 | F4 |
| 1998-99 | 22-9 | 21 | 43 | S16 |
6. Kentucky - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 244-92; JCI Rk: 6 (Prev Rk:2); SOS: 2
2007-08: 18-13; JCI Rk: 58; SOS: 47; Tourney: L1
Last 5 Years: 117-49; JCI Rk: 12; SOS: 5
First 5 Years: 127-43; JCI Rk: 6; SOS: 1
NCAA Apperances: 10 (17 wins)
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 5
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 18-13 | 58 | 47 | L1 |
| 2006-07 | 22-12 | 17 | 1 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 22-13 | 24 | 4 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 28-6 | 7 | 25 | E8 |
| 2003-04 | 27-5 | 7 | 24 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 32-4 | 2 | 9 | E8 |
| 2001-02 | 21-10 | 17 | 4 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 24-10 | 10 | 6 | S16 |
| 1999-00 | 22-10 | 15 | 5 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 28-9 | 7 | 8 | E8 |
5. North Carolina - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 241-100; JCI Rk: 5 (Prev Rk:7); SOS: 1
2007-08: 36-3; JCI Rk: 3; SOS: 8; Tourney: F4
Last 5 Years: 142-33; JCI Rk: 1; SOS: 1
First 5 Years: 99-67; JCI Rk: 22; SOS: 6
NCAA Apperances: 8 (20 wins)
National Championships: 1
Final Fours: 3
Elite 8's: 4
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 36-3 | 3 | 8 | F4 |
| 2006-07 | 31-7 | 7 | 7 | E8 |
| 2005-06 | 23-8 | 19 | 28 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 33-4 | 2 | 1 | NC |
| 2003-04 | 19-11 | 14 | 3 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 19-16 | 46 | 11 | None |
| 2001-02 | 8-20 | 153 | 7 | None |
| 2000-01 | 26-7 | 6 | 16 | L2 |
| 1999-00 | 22-14 | 24 | 4 | F4 |
| 1998-99 | 24-10 | 15 | 20 | L1 |
posted by Jim Colton @ 11:05 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 3 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
Recap: The 7 Seeds
28. Notre Dame
27. Villanova
26. Cincinnati
25. Louisville
Recap: The 6 Seeds
24. Wake Forest
23. Indiana
22. Tennessee
21. Memphis
Recap: The 5 Seeds
20. Oklahoma St
19. Pittsburgh
18. UCLA
17. Oklahoma
Recap: The 4 Seeds
16. Syracuse
15. Ohio State
14. Gonzaga
13. Maryland
THE THREE SEEDS
12. Stanford
Last 10 Years: 233-83; JCI Rk: 12 (Prev Rk:11); SOS: 34
2007-08: 28-8; JCI Rk: 9; SOS: 10; Tourney: S16
Last 5 Years: 110-50; JCI Rk: 25; SOS: 45
First 5 Years: 123-33; JCI Rk: 7; SOS: 29
NCAA Apperances: 9 (10 wins)
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 2
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 28-8 | 9 | 10 | S16 |
| 2006-07 | 18-13 | 52 | 15 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 16-14 | 76 | 62 | None |
| 2004-05 | 18-13 | 43 | 26 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 30-2 | 9 | 111 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 24-9 | 25 | 68 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 20-10 | 21 | 10 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 29-3 | 2 | 19 | E8 |
| 1999-00 | 26-4 | 6 | 58 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 24-7 | 10 | 17 | L2 |
11. Texas
Last 10 Years: 245-93; JCI Rk: 11 (Prev Rk:15); SOS: 19
2007-08: 30-7; JCI Rk: 5; SOS: 2; Tourney: E8
Last 5 Years: 129-43; JCI Rk: 8; SOS: 19
First 5 Years: 116-50; JCI Rk: 16; SOS: 24
NCAA Apperances: 10 (16 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 5
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 30-7 | 5 | 2 | E8 |
| 2006-07 | 25-10 | 25 | 48 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 30-7 | 9 | 33 | E8 |
| 2004-05 | 19-11 | 44 | 47 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 25-8 | 11 | 20 | S16 |
| 2002-03 | 26-7 | 6 | 5 | F4 |
| 2001-02 | 22-12 | 20 | 6 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 25-9 | 17 | 51 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 24-9 | 18 | 14 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 19-13 | 67 | 74 | L1 |
10. Wisconsin
Last 10 Years: 234-95; JCI Rk: 10 (Prev Rk:13); SOS: 9
2007-08: 31-5; JCI Rk: 7; SOS: 54; Tourney: S16
Last 5 Years: 130-39; JCI Rk: 6; SOS: 34
First 5 Years: 104-56; JCI Rk: 17; SOS: 4
NCAA Apperances: 10 (14 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 31-5 | 7 | 54 | S16 |
| 2006-07 | 30-6 | 9 | 35 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 19-12 | 49 | 42 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 25-9 | 10 | 13 | E8 |
| 2003-04 | 25-7 | 18 | 43 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 24-8 | 17 | 45 | S16 |
| 2001-02 | 18-13 | 41 | 22 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 18-11 | 24 | 9 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 22-14 | 14 | 1 | F4 |
| 1998-99 | 22-10 | 12 | 6 | L1 |
9. Arizona - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 236-92; JCI Rk: 9 (Prev Rk:6); SOS: 7
2007-08: 18-15; JCI Rk: 41; SOS: 1; Tourney: L1
Last 5 Years: 108-56; JCI Rk: 23; SOS: 10
First 5 Years: 128-36; JCI Rk: 5; SOS: 13
NCAA Apperances: 10 (15 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 18-15 | 41 | 1 | L1 |
| 2006-07 | 20-11 | 21 | 2 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 20-13 | 41 | 18 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 30-7 | 9 | 17 | E8 |
| 2003-04 | 20-10 | 66 | 90 | L1 |
| 2002-03 | 28-4 | 3 | 42 | E8 |
| 2001-02 | 24-10 | 7 | 2 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 27-8 | 3 | 2 | F4 |
| 1999-00 | 27-7 | 10 | 27 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 22-7 | 20 | 55 | L1 |
posted by Jim Colton @ 11:04 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 4 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
Recap: The 7 Seeds
28. Notre Dame
27. Villanova
26. Cincinnati
25. Louisville
Recap: The 6 Seeds
24. Wake Forest
23. Indiana
22. Tennessee
21. Memphis
Recap: The 5 Seeds
20. Oklahoma St
19. Pittsburgh
18. UCLA
17. Oklahoma
THE 4 SEEDS
16. Syracuse - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 242-97; JCI Rk: 16 (Prev Rk:12); SOS: 52
2007-08: 21-14; JCI Rk: 51; SOS: 55; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 118-52; JCI Rk: 22; SOS: 48
First 5 Years: 124-45; JCI Rk: 12; SOS: 45
NCAA Apperances: 7 (11 wins)
National Championships: 1
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 21-14 | 51 | 55 | None |
| 2006-07 | 24-11 | 59 | 96 | None |
| 2005-06 | 23-12 | 25 | 11 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 27-7 | 18 | 62 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 23-8 | 15 | 17 | S16 |
| 2002-03 | 30-5 | 1 | 2 | NC |
| 2001-02 | 23-13 | 55 | 88 | None |
| 2000-01 | 25-9 | 21 | 58 | L2 |
| 1999-00 | 26-6 | 7 | 40 | S16 |
| 1998-99 | 20-12 | 41 | 45 | L1 |
15. Ohio State
Last 10 Years: 229-101; JCI Rk: 15 (Prev Rk:21); SOS: 24
2007-08: 24-13; JCI Rk: 35; SOS: 39; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 119-51; JCI Rk: 17; SOS: 41
First 5 Years: 110-50; JCI Rk: 15; SOS: 17
NCAA Apperances: 6 (12 wins)
Final Fours: 2
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 2
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 24-13 | 35 | 39 | None |
| 2006-07 | 35-4 | 1 | 9 | F4 |
| 2005-06 | 26-6 | 13 | 56 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 20-12 | 38 | 40 | None |
| 2003-04 | 14-16 | 102 | 68 | None |
| 2002-03 | 17-15 | 54 | 22 | None |
| 2001-02 | 24-8 | 23 | 55 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 20-11 | 34 | 28 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 23-7 | 12 | 21 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 26-9 | 5 | 3 | F4 |
14. Gonzaga
Last 10 Years: 261-67; JCI Rk: 14 (Prev Rk:14); SOS: 83
2007-08: 25-8; JCI Rk: 29; SOS: 89; Tourney: L1
Last 5 Years: 131-31; JCI Rk: 13; SOS: 84
First 5 Years: 130-36; JCI Rk: 18; SOS: 83
NCAA Apperances: 10 (12 wins)
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 25-8 | 29 | 89 | L1 |
| 2006-07 | 23-11 | 61 | 75 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 29-4 | 8 | 87 | S16 |
| 2004-05 | 26-5 | 14 | 80 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 28-3 | 12 | 105 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 24-9 | 38 | 86 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 28-4 | 14 | 111 | L1 |
| 2000-01 | 25-7 | 32 | 99 | S16 |
| 1999-00 | 26-9 | 30 | 72 | S16 |
| 1998-99 | 27-7 | 13 | 70 | E8 |
13. Maryland - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 231-103; JCI Rk: 13 (Prev Rk:10); SOS: 10
2007-08: 19-15; JCI Rk: 73; SOS: 65; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 101-62; JCI Rk: 30; SOS: 14
First 5 Years: 130-41; JCI Rk: 4; SOS: 10
NCAA Apperances: 7 (17 wins)
National Championships: 1
Final Fours: 2
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 19-15 | 73 | 65 | None |
| 2006-07 | 25-9 | 19 | 34 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 18-13 | 52 | 32 | None |
| 2004-05 | 19-13 | 42 | 29 | None |
| 2003-04 | 20-12 | 16 | 2 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 21-10 | 23 | 29 | S16 |
| 2001-02 | 32-4 | 1 | 5 | NC |
| 2000-01 | 25-11 | 7 | 7 | F4 |
| 1999-00 | 25-10 | 25 | 25 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 27-6 | 6 | 21 | S16 |
posted by Jim Colton @ 11:01 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 5 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
Recap: The 7 Seeds
28. Notre Dame
27. Villanova
26. Cincinnati
25. Louisville
Recap: The 6 Seeds
24. Wake Forest
23. Indiana
22. Tennessee
21. Memphis
THE FIVE SEEDS
20. Oklahoma St
Last 10 Years: 220-103; JCI Rk: 20 (Prev Rk:16); SOS: 42
2007-08: 16-16; JCI Rk: 60; SOS: 9; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 109-56; JCI Rk: 21; SOS: 28
First 5 Years: 111-47; JCI Rk: 19; SOS: 56
NCAA Apperances: 7 (11 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 16-16 | 60 | 9 | None |
| 2006-07 | 21-13 | 63 | 62 | None |
| 2005-06 | 17-16 | 84 | 63 | None |
| 2004-05 | 25-7 | 11 | 19 | S16 |
| 2003-04 | 30-4 | 3 | 18 | F4 |
| 2002-03 | 21-10 | 20 | 13 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 23-9 | 30 | 46 | L1 |
| 2000-01 | 19-10 | 57 | 80 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 26-7 | 9 | 33 | E8 |
| 1998-99 | 22-11 | 43 | 75 | L2 |
19. Pittsburgh - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 231-96; JCI Rk: 19 (Prev Rk:23); SOS: 37
2007-08: 26-10; JCI Rk: 17; SOS: 18; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 130-40; JCI Rk: 7; SOS: 20
First 5 Years: 101-56; JCI Rk: 36; SOS: 53
NCAA Apperances: 7 (10 wins)
Sweet 16's: 4
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 26-10 | 17 | 18 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 29-8 | 10 | 32 | S16 |
| 2005-06 | 25-8 | 16 | 29 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 20-9 | 31 | 48 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 30-5 | 5 | 21 | S16 |
| 2002-03 | 28-5 | 4 | 30 | S16 |
| 2001-02 | 28-6 | 9 | 60 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 18-14 | 64 | 53 | None |
| 1999-00 | 13-15 | 112 | 76 | None |
| 1998-99 | 14-16 | 89 | 28 | None |
18. UCLA - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 221-106; JCI Rk: 18 (Prev Rk:18); SOS: 14
2007-08: 34-4; JCI Rk: 4; SOS: 4; Tourney: F4
Last 5 Years: 124-45; JCI Rk: 11; SOS: 18
First 5 Years: 97-61; JCI Rk: 23; SOS: 14
NCAA Apperances: 8 (19 wins)
Final Fours: 3
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 6
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 34-4 | 4 | 4 | F4 |
| 2006-07 | 29-6 | 3 | 3 | F4 |
| 2005-06 | 32-7 | 6 | 27 | F4 |
| 2004-05 | 18-11 | 36 | 27 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 11-17 | 135 | 93 | None |
| 2002-03 | 10-19 | 135 | 24 | None |
| 2001-02 | 21-12 | 22 | 3 | S16 |
| 2000-01 | 23-9 | 9 | 10 | S16 |
| 1999-00 | 21-12 | 31 | 13 | S16 |
| 1998-99 | 22-9 | 23 | 39 | L1 |
17. Oklahoma
Last 10 Years: 235-92; JCI Rk: 17 (Prev Rk:17); SOS: 46
2007-08: 23-12; JCI Rk: 24; SOS: 11; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 102-54; JCI Rk: 36; SOS: 44
First 5 Years: 133-38; JCI Rk: 9; SOS: 44
NCAA Apperances: 8 (12 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 23-12 | 24 | 11 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 15-15 | 86 | 47 | None |
| 2005-06 | 20-9 | 50 | 77 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 25-8 | 20 | 42 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 19-10 | 39 | 45 | None |
| 2002-03 | 27-7 | 8 | 10 | E8 |
| 2001-02 | 31-5 | 3 | 9 | F4 |
| 2000-01 | 27-8 | 19 | 74 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 27-7 | 21 | 63 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 21-11 | 36 | 63 | S16 |
posted by Jim Colton @ 10:59 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 6 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
Recap: The 7 Seeds
28. Notre Dame
27. Villanova
26. Cincinnati
25. Louisville
THE 6 SEEDS
24. Wake Forest
Last 10 Years: 201-120; JCI Rk: 24 (Prev Rk:20); SOS: 12
2007-08: 17-13; JCI Rk: 66; SOS: 69; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 97-62; JCI Rk: 26; SOS: 7
First 5 Years: 104-58; JCI Rk: 20; SOS: 21
NCAA Apperances: 5 (5 wins)
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 17-13 | 66 | 69 | None |
| 2006-07 | 15-16 | 75 | 23 | None |
| 2005-06 | 17-17 | 68 | 30 | None |
| 2004-05 | 27-6 | 6 | 7 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 21-10 | 10 | 5 | S16 |
| 2002-03 | 25-6 | 11 | 46 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 21-13 | 31 | 12 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 19-11 | 23 | 11 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 22-14 | 34 | 26 | None |
| 1998-99 | 17-14 | 47 | 30 | None |
23. Indiana
Last 10 Years: 203-118; JCI Rk: 23 (Prev Rk:22); SOS: 6
2007-08: 25-8; JCI Rk: 27; SOS: 68; Tourney: L1
Last 5 Years: 94-60; JCI Rk: 38; SOS: 22
First 5 Years: 109-58; JCI Rk: 14; SOS: 3
NCAA Apperances: 8 (9 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 25-8 | 27 | 68 | L1 |
| 2006-07 | 21-11 | 26 | 22 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 19-12 | 33 | 12 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 15-14 | 61 | 23 | None |
| 2003-04 | 14-15 | 75 | 36 | None |
| 2002-03 | 21-13 | 27 | 12 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 24-12 | 8 | 1 | F4 |
| 2000-01 | 21-13 | 29 | 12 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 20-9 | 22 | 7 | L1 |
| 1998-99 | 23-11 | 16 | 12 | L2 |
22. Tennessee - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 204-110; JCI Rk: 22 (Prev Rk:24); SOS: 16
2007-08: 30-5; JCI Rk: 6; SOS: 15; Tourney: S16
Last 5 Years: 105-54; JCI Rk: 18; SOS: 6
First 5 Years: 99-56; JCI Rk: 24; SOS: 33
NCAA Apperances: 6 (8 wins)
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 30-5 | 6 | 15 | S16 |
| 2006-07 | 24-11 | 14 | 4 | S16 |
| 2005-06 | 22-8 | 14 | 13 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 14-17 | 96 | 32 | None |
| 2003-04 | 15-13 | 55 | 19 | None |
| 2002-03 | 17-12 | 47 | 43 | None |
| 2001-02 | 14-16 | 67 | 13 | None |
| 2000-01 | 22-12 | 30 | 22 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 25-7 | 16 | 46 | S16 |
| 1998-99 | 21-9 | 24 | 44 | L2 |
21. Memphis - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 244-96; JCI Rk: 21 (Prev Rk:28); SOS: 77
2007-08: 38-2; JCI Rk: 2; SOS: 48; Tourney: F4
Last 5 Years: 148-34; JCI Rk: 4; SOS: 74
First 5 Years: 96-62; JCI Rk: 62; SOS: 80
NCAA Apperances: 5 (12 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 3
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 38-2 | 2 | 48 | F4 |
| 2006-07 | 33-4 | 4 | 85 | E8 |
| 2005-06 | 33-4 | 5 | 68 | E8 |
| 2004-05 | 22-16 | 79 | 83 | None |
| 2003-04 | 22-8 | 25 | 42 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 23-7 | 28 | 82 | L1 |
| 2001-02 | 26-9 | 40 | 114 | None |
| 2000-01 | 20-15 | 68 | 70 | None |
| 1999-00 | 14-16 | 109 | 97 | None |
| 1998-99 | 13-15 | 116 | 76 | None |
posted by Jim Colton @ 10:57 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 7 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
Recap: The 8 Seeds
32. North Carolina St
31. Mississippi St
30. Georgetown
29. Xavier
THE 7 SEEDS
28. Notre Dame
Last 10 Years: 202-116; JCI Rk: 28 (Prev Rk:32); SOS: 35
2007-08: 25-8; JCI Rk: 20; SOS: 53; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 99-54; JCI Rk: 35; SOS: 40
First 5 Years: 103-62; JCI Rk: 31; SOS: 34
NCAA Apperances: 5 (5 wins)
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 25-8 | 20 | 53 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 24-8 | 28 | 73 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 16-14 | 57 | 22 | None |
| 2004-05 | 17-12 | 53 | 54 | None |
| 2003-04 | 17-12 | 40 | 16 | None |
| 2002-03 | 24-10 | 9 | 3 | S16 |
| 2001-02 | 21-11 | 37 | 31 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 22-11 | 37 | 50 | L2 |
| 1999-00 | 22-15 | 40 | 32 | None |
| 1998-99 | 14-15 | 102 | 59 | None |
27. Villanova
Last 10 Years: 204-119; JCI Rk: 27 (Prev Rk:25); SOS: 26
2007-08: 22-13; JCI Rk: 34; SOS: 25; Tourney: S16
Last 5 Years: 110-52; JCI Rk: 16; SOS: 8
First 5 Years: 94-67; JCI Rk: 48; SOS: 50
NCAA Apperances: 5 (7 wins)
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 22-13 | 34 | 25 | S16 |
| 2006-07 | 21-11 | 38 | 31 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 28-5 | 4 | 3 | E8 |
| 2004-05 | 24-8 | 13 | 24 | S16 |
| 2003-04 | 15-15 | 61 | 15 | None |
| 2002-03 | 15-16 | 74 | 40 | None |
| 2001-02 | 19-13 | 51 | 50 | None |
| 2000-01 | 20-14 | 43 | 27 | None |
| 1999-00 | 20-13 | 50 | 68 | None |
| 1998-99 | 20-11 | 40 | 56 | L1 |
26. Cincinnati - ON THE DECLINE
Last 10 Years: 222-102; JCI Rk: 26 (Prev Rk:19); SOS: 66
2007-08: 13-19; JCI Rk: 104; SOS: 14; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 94-66; JCI Rk: 51; SOS: 46
First 5 Years: 128-36; JCI Rk: 13; SOS: 67
NCAA Apperances: 7 (7 wins)
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 13-19 | 104 | 14 | None |
| 2006-07 | 11-19 | 156 | 63 | None |
| 2005-06 | 20-13 | 36 | 17 | None |
| 2004-05 | 25-8 | 25 | 65 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 25-7 | 24 | 59 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 17-12 | 61 | 61 | L1 |
| 2001-02 | 31-4 | 6 | 74 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 25-10 | 28 | 65 | S16 |
| 1999-00 | 29-4 | 5 | 55 | L2 |
| 1998-99 | 26-6 | 14 | 68 | L2 |
25. Louisville - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 215-109; JCI Rk: 25 (Prev Rk:29); SOS: 53
2007-08: 27-9; JCI Rk: 12; SOS: 5; Tourney: E8
Last 5 Years: 122-47; JCI Rk: 15; SOS: 35
First 5 Years: 93-62; JCI Rk: 50; SOS: 63
NCAA Apperances: 7 (9 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 2
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 27-9 | 12 | 5 | E8 |
| 2006-07 | 23-10 | 35 | 53 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 21-13 | 48 | 44 | None |
| 2004-05 | 31-5 | 3 | 28 | F4 |
| 2003-04 | 20-10 | 38 | 44 | L1 |
| 2002-03 | 25-7 | 18 | 55 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 19-13 | 69 | 68 | None |
| 2000-01 | 12-19 | 115 | 62 | None |
| 1999-00 | 18-12 | 49 | 52 | L1 |
| 1998-99 | 19-11 | 34 | 41 | L1 |
posted by Jim Colton @ 10:55 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 8 Seeds
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
Recap: The 9 Seeds
36. Iowa
35. Marquette
34. Oregon
33. Alabama
THE 8 SEEDS
32. North Carolina St
Last 10 Years: 192-134; JCI Rk: 32 (Prev Rk:26); SOS: 13
2007-08: 15-16; JCI Rk: 81; SOS: 31; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 99-66; JCI Rk: 28; SOS: 4
First 5 Years: 93-68; JCI Rk: 47; SOS: 28
NCAA Apperances: 5 (5 wins)
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 15-16 | 81 | 31 | None |
| 2006-07 | 20-16 | 64 | 30 | None |
| 2005-06 | 22-10 | 27 | 34 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 21-14 | 28 | 4 | S16 |
| 2003-04 | 21-10 | 13 | 6 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 18-13 | 49 | 34 | L1 |
| 2001-02 | 23-11 | 25 | 19 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 13-16 | 83 | 15 | None |
| 1999-00 | 20-14 | 53 | 53 | None |
| 1998-99 | 19-14 | 50 | 38 | None |
31. Mississippi St
Last 10 Years: 207-115; JCI Rk: 31 (Prev Rk:34); SOS: 58
2007-08: 23-11; JCI Rk: 42; SOS: 64; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 108-55; JCI Rk: 29; SOS: 51
First 5 Years: 99-60; JCI Rk: 45; SOS: 52
NCAA Apperances: 5 (4 wins)
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 23-11 | 42 | 64 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 21-14 | 46 | 27 | None |
| 2005-06 | 15-15 | 78 | 46 | None |
| 2004-05 | 23-11 | 32 | 53 | L2 |
| 2003-04 | 26-4 | 8 | 48 | L2 |
| 2002-03 | 21-10 | 26 | 27 | L1 |
| 2001-02 | 27-8 | 16 | 42 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 18-13 | 49 | 43 | None |
| 1999-00 | 14-16 | 120 | 67 | None |
| 1998-99 | 19-13 | 58 | 60 | None |
30. Georgetown - ON THE RISE
Last 10 Years: 207-116; JCI Rk: 30 (Prev Rk:36); SOS: 39
2007-08: 28-6; JCI Rk: 10; SOS: 40; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 113-51; JCI Rk: 19; SOS: 23
First 5 Years: 94-65; JCI Rk: 49; SOS: 51
NCAA Apperances: 4 (9 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 3
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 28-6 | 10 | 40 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 30-7 | 6 | 14 | F4 |
| 2005-06 | 23-10 | 15 | 6 | S16 |
| 2004-05 | 19-13 | 49 | 49 | None |
| 2003-04 | 13-15 | 109 | 55 | None |
| 2002-03 | 19-15 | 53 | 25 | None |
| 2001-02 | 18-11 | 49 | 58 | None |
| 2000-01 | 25-8 | 20 | 75 | S16 |
| 1999-00 | 18-15 | 63 | 47 | None |
| 1998-99 | 14-16 | 88 | 32 | None |
29. Xavier
Last 10 Years: 238-93; JCI Rk: 29 (Prev Rk:30); SOS: 79
2007-08: 30-7; JCI Rk: 13; SOS: 37; Tourney: E8
Last 5 Years: 119-50; JCI Rk: 37; SOS: 77
First 5 Years: 119-43; JCI Rk: 29; SOS: 84
NCAA Apperances: 7 (9 wins)
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 2
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 30-7 | 13 | 37 | E8 |
| 2006-07 | 25-9 | 51 | 99 | L2 |
| 2005-06 | 21-11 | 69 | 93 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 17-12 | 113 | 147 | None |
| 2003-04 | 26-11 | 22 | 29 | E8 |
| 2002-03 | 26-6 | 22 | 89 | L2 |
| 2001-02 | 26-6 | 12 | 61 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 21-8 | 41 | 85 | L1 |
| 1999-00 | 21-12 | 77 | 113 | None |
| 1998-99 | 25-11 | 44 | 104 | None |
posted by Jim Colton @ 10:51 AM,
,
Top College Basketball Programs Over the Last 10 Years: The 9 Seeds
It's that time of the year again. Now that the basketball season is over, let's update the final Colton Index rankings for the year and add 2007-08 to the record books. That means we can update my last 10 year rankings by replacing 1997-98 with 1998-99. Previous versions of my 10-year rankings have received more attention than one of my normal blog posts (which means about 10 hits instead of 1 or 2, if my math is correct that's up to a 500% increase in readership. How many blogs can say that?)
Just to get the methodology straight...the rankings are based on the average Colton Index ranking (body-of-work performance of wins and losses over an entire season, including postseason play) over the past 10 years. NCAA Tournament performance is weighted double (each game counts as two). Each season counts the same. To the extent that you don't agree with the rankings, it probably means that you weight these things differently. More than likely you weight recent performance and tournament performance more heavily, or internally rank teams on how you expect them to perform over the next 5-10 years. For each team, I show tournament performance by year as well as rankings for the first five years and last years so you can see how teams are trending and how the rankings might look differently if you adjusted the weights to suit your needs.
We'll group the teams by seed and list them one at a time, building up a to an anti-climatic announcement of the 1 seeds in the next week or so. Stay tuned and enjoy!
36. Iowa - ON THE DECLINE (but they did win the Big Ten Tournament in 2006 and 2001)
Last 10 Years: 185-135; JCI Rk: 36 (Prev Rk:31); SOS: 25
2007-08: 13-19; JCI Rk: 160; SOS: 74; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 92-66; JCI Rk: 55; SOS: 57
First 5 Years: 93-69; JCI Rk: 33; SOS: 9
NCAA Apperances: 4 (3 wins)
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 13-19 | 160 | 74 | None |
| 2006-07 | 17-14 | 78 | 52 | None |
| 2005-06 | 25-9 | 23 | 39 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 21-12 | 30 | 18 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 16-12 | 67 | 61 | None |
| 2002-03 | 17-14 | 70 | 71 | None |
| 2001-02 | 19-16 | 65 | 36 | None |
| 2000-01 | 23-13 | 27 | 21 | L2 |
| 1999-00 | 14-16 | 36 | 2 | None |
| 1998-99 | 20-10 | 11 | 4 | S16 |
35. Marquette
Last 10 Years: 199-111; JCI Rk: 35 (Prev Rk:42); SOS: 69
2007-08: 24-10; JCI Rk: 19; SOS: 16; Tourney: L2
Last 5 Years: 100-54; JCI Rk: 42; SOS: 67
First 5 Years: 99-57; JCI Rk: 46; SOS: 70
NCAA Apperances: 5 (5 wins)
Final Fours: 1
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 24-10 | 19 | 16 | L2 |
| 2006-07 | 23-10 | 39 | 55 | L1 |
| 2005-06 | 19-11 | 40 | 26 | L1 |
| 2004-05 | 18-12 | 85 | 100 | None |
| 2003-04 | 16-11 | 79 | 79 | None |
| 2002-03 | 27-6 | 7 | 18 | F4 |
| 2001-02 | 26-7 | 18 | 69 | L1 |
| 2000-01 | 17-15 | 87 | 79 | None |
| 1999-00 | 15-14 | 89 | 73 | None |
| 1998-99 | 14-15 | 119 | 98 | None |
34. Oregon
Last 10 Years: 194-120; JCI Rk: 34 (Prev Rk:38); SOS: 56
2007-08: 18-14; JCI Rk: 49; SOS: 12; Tourney: L1
Last 5 Years: 90-65; JCI Rk: 49; SOS: 42
First 5 Years: 104-55; JCI Rk: 35; SOS: 57
NCAA Apperances: 5 (6 wins)
Elite 8's: 2
Sweet 16's: 2
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 18-14 | 49 | 12 | L1 |
| 2006-07 | 29-8 | 8 | 17 | E8 |
| 2005-06 | 14-18 | 113 | 58 | None |
| 2004-05 | 14-13 | 68 | 35 | None |
| 2003-04 | 15-12 | 93 | 89 | None |
| 2002-03 | 23-10 | 42 | 75 | L1 |
| 2001-02 | 25-9 | 13 | 25 | E8 |
| 2000-01 | 17-15 | 78 | 49 | None |
| 1999-00 | 21-8 | 32 | 49 | L1 |
| 1998-99 | 18-13 | 49 | 53 | None |
33. Alabama
Last 10 Years: 197-124; JCI Rk: 33 (Prev Rk:27); SOS: 31
2007-08: 17-16; JCI Rk: 97; SOS: 78; Tourney: None
Last 5 Years: 98-62; JCI Rk: 34; SOS: 17
First 5 Years: 99-62; JCI Rk: 42; SOS: 47
NCAA Apperances: 5 (5 wins)
Elite 8's: 1
Sweet 16's: 1
Performance by Season
| Season | W-L | JCI Rk | SOS | NCAA |
| 2007-08 | 17-16 | 97 | 78 | None |
| 2006-07 | 20-12 | 43 | 36 | None |
| 2005-06 | 18-13 | 39 | 9 | L2 |
| 2004-05 | 23-8 | 24 | 41 | L1 |
| 2003-04 | 20-13 | 21 | 8 | E8 |
| 2002-03 | 17-12 | 48 | 31 | L1 |
| 2001-02 | 27-8 | 15 | 41 | L2 |
| 2000-01 | 25-11 | 36 | 66 | None |
| 1999-00 | 13-16 | 101 | 66 | None |
| 1998-99 | 17-15 | 53 | 26 | None |
posted by Jim Colton @ 10:32 AM,
,
The Author:
Jim Colton
Jim lives in Wheaton, IL and when he's not rooting for the Fighting Illini, playing golf, thinking about golf, or masterminding fantasy basketball trades, he has a day job as a banker in Chicago.
About This Blog:
This blog is dedicated to college hoops and the Colton Index college basketball ratings.
Contact Me:
jcolton31@gmail.com
